Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 56 — part 1

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Vote
Paragraph 56 — part 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
378 for · 171 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 35 of 54 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 56/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0121
Dossier
2024/2127(INI)
Vote id
193055
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 378 for, 171 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission and the Member States for the Baltic Sea to propose halting trawling for fish meal and fish oil during a rebuilding phase, and limiting extractive activities in MPAs;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 3Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 0No vote 32 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 53Against 10Abst. 1No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 61Against 58Abst. 9No vote 55 of 183Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ECRFor 9Against 55Abst. 2No vote 15 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 60Against 18Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 13Against 4Abst. 4No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 565 members

No vote recorded, 152

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 152 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 43 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote261 for, 105 against, 174 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.64 530 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.63 523 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.63 474 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 446 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.62 492 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 63 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment261 for, 266 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.61 473 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment308 for, 309 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.61 526 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment378 for, 213 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.61 519 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote304 for, 305 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.61 517 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.61 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193055
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 56 — part 1 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193055, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193055 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193055,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 56 — part 1 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193055}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193055},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193055, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}