Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 43 to paragraph 56

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Vote
Amendment 43 to paragraph 56
Result
162 for · 384 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 54 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, ECR
Official label
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 56 – Am 43
Vote id
193053
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 162 for, 384 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 103Abst. 0No vote 33 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 8Against 53Abst. 2No vote 14 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 53Against 68Abst. 12No vote 50 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ECRFor 55Against 6Abst. 4No vote 16 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 17Against 61Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 6Against 14Abst. 1No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria100
Czechia030
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
France004
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy1600
Lithuania100
Latvia200
Netherlands200
Poland1900
Romania600
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 566 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 13 to recital D Joint communication on humanitarian aidAmendment238 for, 251 against, 88 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.65 473 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.63 489 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 19 to paragraph 12 Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environmentsAmendment268 for, 270 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.63 469 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 23 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment142 for, 395 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.62 486 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.62 485 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.61 480 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment219 for, 337 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.61 483 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.61 490 voters
22 May 2025Amendments 7 + 11 (voted as one) to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le paragraph 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment105 for, 462 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.61 468 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 15 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, paragraph 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment103 for, 438 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.61 473 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 43 to paragraph 56 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193053, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193053 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193053,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 43 to paragraph 56 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193053}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193053},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193053, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}