Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 2

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 2
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
306 for · 225 against · 38 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 54 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0121
Dossier
2024/2127(INI)
Vote id
193037
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 306 for, 225 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “believes that, based on scientific advice, recovery pauses for the respective stocks must be urgently considered, until scientific evidence demonstrates a clear and sustained recovery of the stocks;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 0No vote 32 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 61Against 3Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 45Against 71Abst. 19No vote 48 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ECRFor 3Against 54Abst. 9No vote 15 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 6No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 514 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote335 for, 281 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 520 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote322 for, 289 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.81 523 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 495 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.81 505 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 42 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment283 for, 298 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by EPP, Renew, S&Dr · shared0.81 483 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 520 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote276 for, 287 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 49 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.81 460 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193037
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 9 — part 2 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193037, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193037 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193037,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 2 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193037}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193037},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193037, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}