Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 30 to paragraph 9

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Vote
Amendment 30 to paragraph 9
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
158 for · 374 against · 36 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 54 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, ECR
Official label
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9 – Am 30D
Text
Report A-10-2026-0121
Dossier
2024/2127(INI)
Vote id
193034
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 158 for, 374 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 106Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 108Abst. 26No vote 49 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
ECRFor 60Against 4Abst. 1No vote 16 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 72Against 0Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 21Against 2Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 5Against 12Abst. 2No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Germany1500
France100
Hungary001
Italy100
Poland200
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 149

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 149 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 476 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 511 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment167 for, 363 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 472 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 507 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 509 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment184 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 557 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment195 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 517 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 519 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 509 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 513 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193034
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193034, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193034 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193034,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193034}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193034},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193034, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}