Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: citation 7

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Separate vote: citation 7
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
426 for · 192 against · 17 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – Citation 7
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0245
Dossier
2026/2607(RSP)
Vote id
193012
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 426 for, 192 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 3Abst. 3No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 156Against 2Abst. 0No vote 25 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 4No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 7No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 20Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria200
Germany900
Denmark400
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland600
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 82

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 82 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesSplit vote437 for, 158 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 537 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 590 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 545 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 109 — part 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Split vote449 for, 194 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 591 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 552 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 105 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote451 for, 196 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.95 595 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.95 583 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 549 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote424 for, 158 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193012
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: citation 7 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193012, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193012 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193012,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: citation 7 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193012}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193012},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193012, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}