Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
201 for · 411 against · 29 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 72 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, after point aj – Am 63
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192796
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 201 for, 411 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 90Against 9Abst. 15No vote 22 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 158Abst. 0No vote 25 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 4Against 15Abst. 7No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
No groupFor 18Against 3Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1401
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 516 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 575 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 576 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment185 for, 334 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 518 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)Other181 for, 261 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 40 %r · shared0.92 413 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 578 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 462 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 546 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 543 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment228 for, 409 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192796
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192796, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192796 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192796,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192796}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192796},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192796, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}