Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point af — part 2

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Paragraph 1, point af — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
482 for · 132 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 64 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point af/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192793
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 482 for, 132 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 153Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 30Against 45Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 17 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 6No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 3No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1600
Finland400
France400
Greece700
Croatia500
Hungary300
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands400
Poland2000
Portugal700
Romania800
Sweden400
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 623 members

No vote recorded, 94

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 94 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Recital D — part 2 Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in CabaretSplit vote434 for, 161 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 534 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 563 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.85 578 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 541 voters
8 Jul 2025Separate vote on citation 8 Security of energy supply in the EUSeparate vote504 for, 148 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 576 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 554 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote473 for, 121 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 570 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 499 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 9 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote461 for, 121 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 573 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192793
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192793, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192793 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192793,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192793}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192793},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192793, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}