Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
308 for · 313 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 57 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point ad – Am 34
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192788
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 308 for, 313 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 2Abst. 1No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 54Against 14Abst. 3No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
EPPFor 4Against 152Abst. 0No vote 27 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 2No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 26Against 45Abst. 6No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
France040
Greece002
Croatia010
Italy0200
Lithuania020
Latvia030
Netherlands030
Poland0200
Romania060
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.90 587 voters
12 Mar 2025Recital H — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaSplit vote344 for, 297 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 585 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.89 406 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment294 for, 334 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 603 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 577 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 32 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment304 for, 334 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 601 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 284 to Article 2, after paragraph 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment301 for, 255 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 518 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 148 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment305 for, 325 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 574 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.87 526 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 7 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote315 for, 297 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192788
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192788, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192788 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192788,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192788}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192788},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192788, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}