Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac
Result
461 for · 94 against · 77 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 55 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point ac – Am 33
Vote id
192786
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 461 for, 94 against, 77 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 1Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 1Abst. 11No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
EPPFor 151Against 0Abst. 3No vote 29 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 25Against 27Abst. 24No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.03
PatriotsFor 0Against 43Abst. 34No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 5Against 18Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia210
Germany700
Spain010
France100
Greece101
Luxembourg001
Poland100
Romania010
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 14 — part 3 Recruitment of children by organised crimeSplit vote402 for, 135 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 512 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.81 362 voters
28 Nov 2024Recital F — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote412 for, 120 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 10 — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote411 for, 121 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 539 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 579 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 120 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 511 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 514 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.79 569 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 11 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote483 for, 116 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.79 565 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 524 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192786, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192786 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192786,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192786}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192786},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192786, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}