Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab
Result
199 for · 399 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 47 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point ab – Am 54
Vote id
192781
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 199 for, 399 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 36Against 3Abst. 9No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
S&DFor 81Against 14Abst. 4No vote 37 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
RenewFor 9Against 61Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 5Against 153Abst. 0No vote 25 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 2Against 72Abst. 1No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 1No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 8Against 15Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria101
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany527
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia001
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 620 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment177 for, 389 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.94 516 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAmendment197 for, 403 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 562 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment172 for, 379 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.94 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment169 for, 390 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.94 519 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment179 for, 376 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.94 519 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment184 for, 380 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.92 520 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment184 for, 367 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.92 521 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment207 for, 363 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.91 522 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment199 for, 359 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.91 521 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment175 for, 387 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.91 523 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192781, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192781 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192781,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192781}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192781},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192781, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}