Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point v — part 2

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Paragraph 1, point v — part 2
Result
417 for · 177 against · 51 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 37 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point v/2
Vote id
192775
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 417 for, 177 against, 51 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘explore ways to strengthen the UNGA’s role in this area, through innovative and democratic voting systems whereby a UNGA qualified majority can overcome a UNSC veto deadlock in line with the United for Peace doctrine;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 0Abst. 31No vote 2 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.58
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 0Abst. 4No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 8Abst. 10No vote 25 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 2No vote 8 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 7Against 71Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 13Against 10Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
No groupFor 5Against 19Abst. 1No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia710
Denmark010
Spain060
France0260
Greece010
Hungary090
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 20 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote432 for, 145 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 541 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 557 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote433 for, 161 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 572 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 14 — part 2 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote378 for, 166 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 524 voters
19 Jun 2025Separate vote on citation 13 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSeparate vote397 for, 162 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 520 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 598 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.84 575 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote416 for, 170 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 531 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192775, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192775 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192775,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192775}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192775},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192775, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}