Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 1, point o

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 1, point o
Result
148 for · 475 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point o – Am 16
Vote id
192765
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 148 for, 475 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 121Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 154Abst. 1No vote 25 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 50Against 24Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
PatriotsFor 60Against 7Abst. 11No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 8No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria040
Czechia050
Germany0270
Denmark020
Estonia010
Spain0190
Finland040
France301
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary030
Ireland040
Italy070
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden040
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 60 to paragraph 4 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment173 for, 474 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 586 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Establishing an EU talent poolRejection156 for, 462 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.92 572 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 96 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment168 for, 450 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAmendment155 for, 465 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 570 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 61 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment167 for, 455 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.91 599 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment185 for, 439 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.91 602 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Establishing an EU talent poolProcedural160 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.90 569 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 49 to recital C Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment144 for, 442 against, 67 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 600 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Amendment182 for, 466 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 610 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment175 for, 446 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 594 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 1, point o — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192765, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192765 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192765,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 1, point o — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192765}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192765},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192765, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}