Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point n — part 4

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Paragraph 1, point n — part 4
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
432 for · 178 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point n/4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192763
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 432 for, 178 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “with the aim of fully revoking it in the future”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 2Abst. 7No vote 5 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 1Abst. 2No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 144Against 6Abst. 7No vote 26 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 1No vote 9 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 18Against 8Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
No groupFor 1Against 22Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia030
Germany151
Spain010
France010
Greece031
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia051

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 631 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 546 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 576 voters
19 Jun 2025Separate vote on citation 13 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSeparate vote397 for, 162 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 509 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 14 — part 2 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote378 for, 166 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 520 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote463 for, 162 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 576 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 522 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 542 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.88 558 voters
14 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Final429 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.87 555 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 544 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192763
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point n — part 4 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192763, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192763 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192763,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point n — part 4 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192763}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192763},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192763, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}