Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point n — part 2

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Paragraph 1, point n — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
450 for · 171 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point n/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192761
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 450 for, 171 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and establishes conditions for strictly limiting the use of the veto when it blocks essential UN action,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 1Abst. 0No vote 4 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 151Against 2Abst. 5No vote 25 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 1Against 73Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 16Against 5Abst. 5No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
No groupFor 2Against 21Abst. 2No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 82

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 82 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote463 for, 162 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 579 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 550 voters
19 Jun 2025Separate vote on citation 13 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSeparate vote397 for, 162 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 13 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment443 for, 185 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 564 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 590 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesSplit vote437 for, 158 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 544 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 547 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 591 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 527 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.90 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192761
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192761, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192761 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192761,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192761}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192761},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192761, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}