Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 18 May 2026
Result
355 for · 86 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 May 2026, 18:12
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena
Vote id
192714
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 40Abst. 2No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 71Against 5Abst. 1No vote 59 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 34 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 107Against 0Abst. 1No vote 75 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Germany500
Denmark400
Finland200
France810
Lithuania200
Netherlands700
Poland100
Romania100
Sweden100
Slovenia010
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 448 members

No vote recorded, 269

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 269 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.90 416 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 60 + 91 + 132 (voted as one) to Annex II; Annex III – introductory part Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment565 for, 92 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.89 423 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.89 422 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 82 + 122 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment556 for, 102 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.89 424 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.88 409 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.88 359 voters
17 Dec 2024Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationFinal546 for, 97 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.86 408 voters
8 May 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketSplit vote375 for, 92 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 300 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 395 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.85 400 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192714
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena”. Vote, 18 May 2026. votingId 192714. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192714 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-18-192714,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192714}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192714},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192714. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}