Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to paragraph 4

New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities

Vote
Amendment 1 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
104 for · 377 against · 86 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0216/2026 – § 4 – Am 1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0232
Dossier
2026/2703(RSP)
Vote id
192363
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 104 for, 377 against, 86 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 20Against 3Abst. 3No vote 20 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
GreensFor 2Against 43Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 70Against 16Abst. 23No vote 26 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 139Abst. 0No vote 46 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 13 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 4Against 11Abst. 50No vote 20 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium011
Germany200
Denmark100
Spain112
Finland200
Ireland210
Italy800
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

No vote recorded, 152

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 152 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
14 Nov 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment167 for, 384 against, 78 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 503 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 502 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment127 for, 321 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 404 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment214 for, 438 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 173 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment162 for, 474 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 517 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 86 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment167 for, 449 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 544 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment227 for, 425 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 527 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment155 for, 402 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 464 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment240 for, 312 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 483 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAmendment155 for, 358 against, 115 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192363
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 — New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192363, reference 2026/2703(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192363 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192363,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 — New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192363}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192363},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192363, reference 2026/2703(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}