Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 14

Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 14
Result
399 for · 104 against · 75 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0190/2026 – After § 14 – Am 6
Vote id
192348
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 399 for, 104 against, 75 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 59Against 1Abst. 5No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 136Against 1Abst. 1No vote 47 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 5Against 61Abst. 4No vote 11 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 13Abst. 58No vote 14 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 2Against 21Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 6No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 578 members

No vote recorded, 141

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 141 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 481 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 500 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 525 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 505 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 14 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Split vote467 for, 150 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 535 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 503 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 494 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 508 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 31 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote440 for, 157 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 14 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192348, reference 2026/2596(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192348 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192348,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 14 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192348}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192348},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192348, reference 2026/2596(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}