Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 3

Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
186 for · 326 against · 56 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0190/2026 – After § 3 – Am 3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0190
Dossier
2026/2596(RSP)
Vote id
192343
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 186 for, 326 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 1Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 43Against 1Abst. 1No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 97Against 9Abst. 0No vote 29 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 1Against 62Abst. 2No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 54 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 12 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 1Against 22Abst. 44No vote 18 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 10Against 9Abst. 8No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria030
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Cyprus010
Czechia040
Germany0250
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0160
Finland020
France050
Greece020
Croatia010
Hungary040
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Netherlands040
Poland0200
Portugal030
Romania070
Sweden050
Slovenia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 503 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 497 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 528 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 489 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 512 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 401 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 512 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 398 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 482 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192343
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 3 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192343, reference 2026/2596(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192343 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192343,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 3 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192343}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192343},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192343, reference 2026/2596(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}