Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to paragraph 2

Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

Vote
Amendment 9 to paragraph 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
136 for · 401 against · 42 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0190/2026 – § 2 – Am 9
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0190
Dossier
2026/2596(RSP)
Vote id
192342
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 136 for, 401 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 107Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 1No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 136Abst. 0No vote 47 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 66Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 32Against 0Abst. 38No vote 15 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 12Against 13Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment188 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 533 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 476 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment189 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment188 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 535 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment188 for, 456 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 529 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment190 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 536 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 497 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 542 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 524 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Amendment192 for, 443 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192342
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192342, reference 2026/2596(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192342 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192342,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 — Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192342}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192342},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192342, reference 2026/2596(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}