Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 46

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 46
Result
244 for · 297 against · 41 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 38 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 46 – Am 8
Vote id
191965
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 244 for, 297 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 44Against 59Abst. 7No vote 25 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
RenewFor 30Against 32Abst. 1No vote 14 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
EPPFor 20Against 117Abst. 1No vote 47 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 5Against 57Abst. 9No vote 10 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 54Against 5Abst. 12No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 11Against 4Abst. 10No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0140
France001
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment207 for, 431 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.67 525 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 104 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment219 for, 276 against, 154 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.66 573 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment250 for, 253 against, 148 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.66 574 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 288 to Article 8, paragraph 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment240 for, 216 against, 125 abstained Adopted For 41 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 490 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 92, adding text after recital 15 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment202 for, 279 against, 160 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 567 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 33 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment159 for, 474 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 544 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 286 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment177 for, 375 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 489 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 38, adding text after recital 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment228 for, 252 against, 177 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.61 533 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 Relations between the EU and Saudi ArabiaAmendment215 for, 390 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.61 542 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 283 to Article 2, after paragraph 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment170 for, 386 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 486 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 46 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 191965, reference 2025/2053(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191965 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-191965,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 46 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191965}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191965},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191965, reference 2025/2053(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}