Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 1

Banking Union – annual report 2025

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
380 for · 154 against · 40 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 7 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 4/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0079
Dossier
2025/2136(INI)
Vote id
191859
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 380 for, 154 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Emphasises the banking sector’s role in financing the twin transition; highlights the simplification efforts under the EU’s sustainable finance framework to ensure coherence, reduce duplication and align obligations across banking, disclosure and risk-management rules;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 12Abst. 22No vote 12 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 2No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 111Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 3Abst. 0No vote 16 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 137Against 1Abst. 0No vote 47 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 6Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 20Against 42Abst. 8No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 10Abst. 8No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Germany630
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1200
Ireland500
Italy100
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Netherlands500
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden100
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.87 507 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 5 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote431 for, 181 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 528 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 532 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.85 528 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.84 532 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.83 470 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 470 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.83 531 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 474 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191859
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Banking Union – annual report 2025”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 191859, reference 2025/2136(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191859 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-191859,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Banking Union – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191859}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191859},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191859, reference 2025/2136(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}