Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital BM

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Separate vote: recital BM
Result
391 for · 202 against · 31 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 123 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BM
Vote id
191722
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 391 for, 202 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 3Abst. 1No vote 16 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 59Against 4Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 118Against 13Abst. 25No vote 29 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
ECRFor 2Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1300
Denmark030
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania501
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

No vote recorded, 95

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 95 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSplit vote455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.91 589 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.90 571 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 2 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote408 for, 192 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 611 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 3 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 169 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 534 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.89 563 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 536 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 505 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.88 554 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital BM — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191722, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191722 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191722,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital BM — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191722}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191722},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191722, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}