Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital BB — part 2

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Recital BB — part 2
Result
308 for · 279 against · 41 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 118 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, EPP · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BB/2
Vote id
191716
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 308 for, 279 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 20Against 135Abst. 1No vote 29 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 7Against 46Abst. 25No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 5Against 63Abst. 6No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 9Abst. 9No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia210
Denmark001
Estonia001
Spain020
Finland100
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0240
Lithuania011
Latvia030
Netherlands012
Poland0117
Romania140
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 628 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 33 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote303 for, 328 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.87 577 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 528 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 604 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Amendment 41 to recital 22 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment302 for, 335 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 45 %r · shared0.86 578 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 533 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 530 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 522 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote254 for, 324 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 543 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 508 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital BB — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191716, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191716 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191716,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital BB — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191716}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191716},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191716, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}