Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital AZ — part 2

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Recital AZ — part 2
Decision
No. 24 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
344 for · 216 against · 49 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 116 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, EPP · split vote: EPP · separate vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AZ/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0042
Dossier
2025/2135(INI)
Vote id
191713
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 61Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 79Against 32Abst. 31No vote 43 of 185Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 6No vote 2 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 5No vote 13 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 7No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0240
Lithuania020
Latvia030
Netherlands030
Poland0153
Romania060
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 110

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 110 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.92 459 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 77 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote346 for, 224 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 532 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumFinal422 for, 219 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.90 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 555 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 487 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote355 for, 177 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.89 481 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 102 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSeparate vote291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 590 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 28 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote336 for, 218 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.88 537 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote388 for, 169 against, 88 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 555 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 27 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote341 for, 218 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191713
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AZ — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191713, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191713 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191713,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AZ — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191713}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191713},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191713, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}