Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 67 to recital H

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 67 to recital H
Decision
No. 24 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
160 for · 432 against · 37 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 97 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital H – Am 67
Text
Report A-10-2026-0042
Dossier
2025/2135(INI)
Vote id
191690
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 160 for, 432 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 1No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 153Abst. 0No vote 28 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 45Against 2Abst. 26No vote 12 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 8Against 9Abst. 8No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria006
Belgium002
Czechia601
Denmark001
Spain500
France2620
Greece001
Hungary700
Italy005
Netherlands006
Poland102
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 90

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 90 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment181 for, 419 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 609 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 581 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 13 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment154 for, 474 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 586 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 557 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 39 to paragraph 120, after point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 441 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 624 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 584 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment192 for, 465 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.93 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 253 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment187 for, 453 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 624 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment187 for, 419 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191690
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 67 to recital H — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191690, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191690 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191690,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 67 to recital H — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191690}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191690},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191690, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}