Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 86

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 86
Result
167 for · 449 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 71 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 86 – Am 6
Vote id
191661
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 167 for, 449 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 14Against 31Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
S&DFor 101Against 3Abst. 6No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 158Abst. 0No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 1No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 13Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0270
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland130
France050
Greece060
Croatia030
Hungary040
Ireland040
Italy070
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden050
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 628 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 173 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment162 for, 474 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 572 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment159 for, 391 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 506 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment155 for, 402 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 57, adding text after recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 516 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 532 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 423 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 569 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 528 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 61 to paragraph 54 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment176 for, 459 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.86 568 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 4 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment216 for, 389 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 561 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 532 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 86 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191661, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191661 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191661,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 86 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191661}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191661},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191661, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}