Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 67 — part 1

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Paragraph 67 — part 1
Decision
No. 24 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
429 for · 192 against · 15 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 59 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 67/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0042
Dossier
2025/2135(INI)
Vote id
191647
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 429 for, 192 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Urges the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary measures to fight hate speech and hate crime, both offline and online, especially where such conduct can escalate into violence, including gender-based violence; further stresses the importance of putting in place EU legislation to combat hate crimes and hate speech, including on grounds such as gender identity and sexual orientation; encourages the Commission to follow up on the LGBTIQ+ equality strategy 2026-2030;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 4Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 146Against 6Abst. 1No vote 32 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 2Against 74Abst. 3No vote 2 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 6No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 12Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia120
Germany602
France100
Greece130
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia132

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 636 members

No vote recorded, 83

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 83 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.94 572 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 516 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 547 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 545 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 517 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 570 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 567 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 542 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 543 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191647
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 67 — part 1 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191647, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191647 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191647,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 67 — part 1 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191647}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191647},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191647, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}