Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 61

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 61
Result
416 for · 187 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 55 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · separate vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 61
Vote id
191641
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 113Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 135Against 12Abst. 8No vote 30 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 8No vote 0 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 6Against 62Abst. 6No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 12Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Germany1300
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1810
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania100
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

No vote recorded, 89

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 89 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaSplit vote436 for, 208 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 597 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.92 570 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.92 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote461 for, 186 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 593 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote452 for, 172 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 590 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 87 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote411 for, 187 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 553 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 568 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 593 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumFinal422 for, 219 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 591 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 512 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 61 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191641, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191641 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191641,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 61 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191641}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191641},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191641, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}