Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 56 — part 2

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Paragraph 56 — part 2
Result
271 for · 331 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 51 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, EPP · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 56/2
Vote id
191637
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 271 for, 331 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 4Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 11Against 140Abst. 8No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 8No vote 1 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 16Abst. 8No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium210
Bulgaria031
Cyprus020
Czechia031
Germany0270
Denmark010
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland040
France050
Greece060
Croatia030
Hungary050
Ireland301
Italy061
Lithuania030
Luxembourg002
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland2172
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden410
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 521 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 530 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 515 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 623 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 527 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.92 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 620 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote267 for, 297 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.92 504 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 499 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 532 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 56 — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191637, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191637 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191637,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 56 — part 2 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191637}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191637},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191637, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}