Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 54

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 54
Decision
No. 24 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
414 for · 195 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 49 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 54
Text
Report A-10-2026-0042
Dossier
2025/2135(INI)
Vote id
191634
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 2Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 1No vote 11 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 139Against 9Abst. 12No vote 25 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 3Against 76Abst. 2No vote 0 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 5No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 12Abst. 8No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia025
Denmark010
Spain040
France0280
Greece010
Hungary070
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 82

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 82 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.94 568 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 542 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 569 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 572 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUFinal447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.93 612 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 572 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 574 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote421 for, 178 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 574 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote417 for, 199 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 572 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 574 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191634
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 54 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191634, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191634 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191634,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 54 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191634}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191634},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191634, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}