Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 55, after paragraph 46

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 55, after paragraph 46
Decision
No. 24 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
210 for · 420 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 41 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, S&D
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 46 – Am 55
Text
Report A-10-2026-0042
Dossier
2025/2135(INI)
Vote id
191625
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 210 for, 420 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 1Against 44Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 119Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 4Against 60Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 17Against 144Abst. 1No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 3No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 71Against 3Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands150
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 24 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 613 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 621 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 540 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 615 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 547 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 547 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment192 for, 456 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.92 588 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 51 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment207 for, 421 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.92 556 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 522 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191625
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 55, after paragraph 46 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191625, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191625 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191625,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 55, after paragraph 46 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191625}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191625},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191625, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}