Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 62, after paragraph 12

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 62, after paragraph 12
Result
199 for · 413 against · 25 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 12 – Am 62
Vote id
191595
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 199 for, 413 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 13Against 136Abst. 13No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 74Against 2Abst. 5No vote 0 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 7Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain500
France2700
Greece100
Hungary700
Italy500
Netherlands600
Poland300
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 82

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 82 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.95 410 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 98 to recital 3 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment204 for, 451 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 596 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment186 for, 378 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 588 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 546 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital B Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment200 for, 382 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 532 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 611 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 580 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 512 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 62, after paragraph 12 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191595, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191595 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191595,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 62, after paragraph 12 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191595}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191595},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191595, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}