Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 51, after paragraph 6

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 51, after paragraph 6
Result
192 for · 441 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, S&D
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 6 – Am 51
Vote id
191589
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 192 for, 441 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 118Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 5Against 152Abst. 2No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 4No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 17Abst. 1No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia120
Germany170
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania200
Slovakia231

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 568 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 435 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 78 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment190 for, 460 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.96 585 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 574 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 574 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 572 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment180 for, 455 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, Renewr · shared0.96 620 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 589 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 571 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 79 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment196 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 51, after paragraph 6 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191589, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191589 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191589,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 51, after paragraph 6 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191589}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191589},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191589, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}