Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 39, after paragraph 3

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 39, after paragraph 3
Result
196 for · 417 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 3 – Am 39
Vote id
191584
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 196 for, 417 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 115Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 9Against 144Abst. 2No vote 30 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 76Against 3Abst. 2No vote 0 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 11Against 4Abst. 10No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 90

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 90 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 605 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 578 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment181 for, 419 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 603 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 582 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment184 for, 392 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 519 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 606 voters
19 Dec 2024Amendment 12 to paragraph 1, point h Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAmendment164 for, 398 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 502 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 576 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 609 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 39, after paragraph 3 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191584, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191584 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191584,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 39, after paragraph 3 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191584}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191584},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191584, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}