Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission

Vote
Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv
Result
179 for · 384 against · 89 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 94 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 247, after point iv – Am 28
Vote id
191532
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 179 for, 384 against, 89 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 12Against 33Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
S&DFor 30Against 90Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
RenewFor 11Against 55Abst. 1No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
EPPFor 0Against 166Abst. 0No vote 19 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 4Against 10Abst. 67No vote 0 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 17No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia210
Germany800
France010
Greece400
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania002
Slovakia401

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment124 for, 503 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 19 %r · shared0.71 588 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment173 for, 433 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.71 587 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment67 for, 378 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 439 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment85 for, 471 against, 93 abstained Rejected For 13 %r · shared0.69 589 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment182 for, 436 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.69 590 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAmendment171 for, 461 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.68 590 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 61 to Article 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment108 for, 480 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 567 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment132 for, 434 against, 73 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 582 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 14 Clean Industrial DealAmendment96 for, 419 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 520 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAmendment188 for, 330 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 547 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191532, reference 2025/2145(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191532 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191532,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191532}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191532},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191532, reference 2025/2145(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}