Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 117

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 117
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
336 for · 261 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 117
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191427
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 336 for, 261 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 3Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 61Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 25Against 113Abst. 15No vote 32 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ECRFor 6Against 69Abst. 3No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 28Against 37Abst. 9No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 9Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus010
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1810
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1610
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote336 for, 280 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.92 613 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on citation 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote287 for, 226 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 489 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 7 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote315 for, 297 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 29 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote292 for, 262 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 544 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital H Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote298 for, 239 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.85 535 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 7 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote367 for, 272 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.85 573 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 23 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote361 for, 280 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.85 579 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote319 for, 183 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.84 482 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.84 388 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191427
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 117 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191427, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191427 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191427,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 117 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191427}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191427},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191427, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}