Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to paragraph 116

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 9 to paragraph 116
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
188 for · 422 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 116 – Am 9
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191426
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 422 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 142Abst. 7No vote 32 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 3No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 13Against 9Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy020
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

No vote recorded, 95

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 95 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 606 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 603 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 568 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 559 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 499 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 499 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 572 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 602 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 610 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 577 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191426
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191426, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191426 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191426,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191426}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191426},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191426, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}