Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 112 — part 2

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Paragraph 112 — part 2
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
408 for · 192 against · 22 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191423
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 408 for, 192 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that migration and asylum policies, including the Pact on Migration and Asylum, are implemented in full compliance with the Charter, the principle of non-refoulement and the principle of responsibility-sharing to ensure that people’s rights to asylum and international protection are upheld;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 134Against 5Abst. 17No vote 29 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 1No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 12Abst. 3No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark101
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland400
France220
Greece600
Croatia200
Hungary500
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania210
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands400
Poland3216
Portugal700
Romania800
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AC Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote412 for, 199 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 610 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 556 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 506 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 554 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 609 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 529 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 71 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 549 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 177, point vii — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionSplit vote446 for, 193 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 616 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191423
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 112 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191423, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191423 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191423,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 112 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191423}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191423},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191423, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}