Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 112 — part 1

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Paragraph 112 — part 1
Result
498 for · 80 against · 57 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/1
Vote id
191422
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 498 for, 80 against, 57 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Reiterates the obligation of Member States to respect EU and international law in the field of migration and asylum on land and at sea;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 118Against 2Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 61Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 156Against 2Abst. 0No vote 27 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 23Against 12Abst. 43No vote 3 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
PatriotsFor 35Against 33Abst. 7No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 3No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 17Against 5Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece301
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 84

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 84 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 78 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 497 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote420 for, 88 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 512 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsFinal458 for, 72 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.79 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 512 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 509 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 56 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote488 for, 87 against, 112 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.75 602 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 524 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 511 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 563 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 4 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote405 for, 68 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.74 524 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 112 — part 1 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191422, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191422 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191422,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 112 — part 1 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191422}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191422},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191422, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}