Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7 to paragraph 112

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 7 to paragraph 112
Result
207 for · 410 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112 – Am 7
Vote id
191420
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 119Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 59Abst. 0No vote 15 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 8Against 140Abst. 4No vote 33 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 5No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium050
Bulgaria020
Germany350
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland020
France0120
Ireland050
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Netherlands040
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden010
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment211 for, 440 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 572 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment213 for, 421 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 557 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 611 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 68 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment195 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.98 569 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 70 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment206 for, 431 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.98 556 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.98 584 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 135, adding text after paragraph 49 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment209 for, 429 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.98 565 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 131 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment202 for, 431 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 565 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment181 for, 380 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 513 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment196 for, 451 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.98 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191420, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191420 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191420,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191420}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191420},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191420, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}