Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 102

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 102
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
291 for · 240 against · 74 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 102
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191418
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 2Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 59Against 1Abst. 0No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 36Against 53Abst. 58No vote 38 of 185Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.09
ECRFor 1Against 73Abst. 3No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 68Abst. 6No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 16Abst. 7No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria200
Germany700
Denmark310
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1200
Ireland500
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal200
Sweden100
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.88 590 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 545 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 77 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote346 for, 224 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 532 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 548 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 553 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 553 voters
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.86 460 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 593 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital M — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote331 for, 220 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.85 516 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSeparate vote347 for, 257 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191418
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 102 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191418, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191418 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191418,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 102 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191418}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191418},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191418, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}