Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 100

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 100
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
357 for · 203 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 100
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191416
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 357 for, 203 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 3Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 85Against 31Abst. 26No vote 43 of 185Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
ECRFor 10Against 66Abst. 1No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 8No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 1Against 25Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 3Against 12Abst. 9No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece301
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 60 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote366 for, 190 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 598 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 600 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 593 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 569 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 29 — part 5 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)Amendment420 for, 187 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 564 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 17 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote417 for, 189 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 602 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.83 482 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 16 — part 3 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)Amendment426 for, 184 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 564 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BF Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote422 for, 180 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 550 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 598 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191416
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 100 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191416, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191416 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191416,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 100 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191416}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191416},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191416, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}