Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 44

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 44
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
181 for · 419 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 44 – Am 16
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191410
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 419 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 15 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 149Abst. 1No vote 31 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 3No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 6No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 10Against 5Abst. 10No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium050
Bulgaria020
Germany080
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland020
France0120
Ireland050
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Netherlands050
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania010
Sweden010
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 572 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 609 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment187 for, 419 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 607 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 607 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 603 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 566 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 583 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 484 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment192 for, 465 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.97 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191410
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191410, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191410 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191410,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191410}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191410},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191410, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}