Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 15 — part 2

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Paragraph 15 — part 2
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
375 for · 130 against · 114 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: S&D
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191407
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 375 for, 130 against, 114 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 61 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 5Abst. 8No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
GreensFor 42Against 2Abst. 1No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 39Against 36Abst. 41No vote 19 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.03
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 151Against 5Abst. 0No vote 29 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 26Against 46Abst. 5No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 12Against 26Abst. 34No vote 13 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 22No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria005
Belgium210
Bulgaria200
Cyprus001
Germany1012
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain0161
Finland200
France1120
Greece300
Croatia003
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy0115
Lithuania110
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal413
Romania141
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 619 members

No vote recorded, 100

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 100 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote327 for, 235 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.61 524 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote334 for, 259 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.58 530 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital L — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote328 for, 237 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.57 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesFinal417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.56 570 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.55 527 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.55 563 voters
18 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 40 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeSeparate vote414 for, 152 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.54 515 voters
18 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 39 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeSeparate vote411 for, 152 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.54 512 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital T Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote429 for, 153 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.53 528 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 145 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.53 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191407
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 15 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191407, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191407 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191407,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 15 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191407}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191407},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191407, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}