Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 18, after paragraph 10

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 18, after paragraph 10
Result
193 for · 409 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 10 – Am 18
Vote id
191403
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 193 for, 409 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 41Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 1Against 43Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 2No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 2Against 59Abst. 1No vote 15 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 10Against 143Abst. 2No vote 30 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 3No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 6No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 14Against 4Abst. 6No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia300
Germany105
France100
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 562 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 558 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAmendment179 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 512 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment194 for, 408 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 533 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 559 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 504 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 532 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 547 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 18, after paragraph 10 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191403, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191403 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191403,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 18, after paragraph 10 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191403}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191403},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191403, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}