Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 138 — part 2

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament

Vote
Paragraph 138 — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
444 for · 131 against · 77 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 86 of 97 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0081
Dossier
2025/2146(DEC)
Vote id
191387
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 444 for, 131 against, 77 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘notes that Parliament’s administration has requested clarification from the PfE Group; notes that the discharge authority has not yet been informed but expects to be informed without delay of any further developments and of the outcome of the administrative follow-up in this matter;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 8No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 52Abst. 26No vote 0 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 3No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ESNFor 0Against 1Abst. 26No vote 0 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 3Abst. 14No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 557 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.92 369 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 586 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 579 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 582 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote424 for, 158 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 561 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 561 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment402 for, 135 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 569 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 559 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 559 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191387
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 138 — part 2 — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191387, reference 2025/2146(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191387 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191387,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 138 — part 2 — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191387}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191387},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191387, reference 2025/2146(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}