Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 51, after paragraph 43

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote
Amendment 51, after paragraph 43
Result
118 for · 531 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 71 of 88 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 43 – Am 51
Vote id
191222
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 118 for, 531 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 39Against 6Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
S&DFor 19Against 107Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
RenewFor 6Against 65Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 0Against 165Abst. 2No vote 18 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 1No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 6No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus001
Czechia210
Germany701
France010
Greece103
Luxembourg010
Poland100
Romania011
Slovakia150

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 27 to paragraph 16 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment131 for, 483 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 582 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 537 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 553 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment137 for, 478 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 585 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital D Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesAmendment110 for, 516 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 606 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 55 to recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 544 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 564 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 585 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 543 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 51, after paragraph 43 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191222, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191222 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191222,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 51, after paragraph 43 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191222}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191222},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191222, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}