Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22, after paragraph 29

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote
Amendment 22, after paragraph 29
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
188 for · 456 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 51 of 88 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 29 – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2026-0044
Dossier
2025/2246(BUI)
Vote id
191202
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 162Abst. 1No vote 19 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 68Against 3Abst. 4No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 643 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment173 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 536 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment190 for, 470 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 611 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 607 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 96 to Article 7, after paragraph 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment194 for, 467 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 612 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 631 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 602 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 605 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191202
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 22, after paragraph 29 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191202, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191202 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191202,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22, after paragraph 29 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191202}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191202},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191202, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}