Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 47, after paragraph 10

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote
Amendment 47, after paragraph 10
Result
105 for · 525 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 88 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 10 – Am 47
Vote id
191162
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 105 for, 525 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 4Against 122Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 1No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 153Abst. 11No vote 21 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 1Against 73Abst. 1No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 7No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 10Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium120
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland020
France0130
Greece030
Croatia120
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy2160
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta010
Netherlands030
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 540 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 610 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 647 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 548 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 533 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 523 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 589 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to recital A Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 587 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 23 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment115 for, 543 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 608 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 45, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment111 for, 511 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 581 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 47, after paragraph 10 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191162, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191162 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191162,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 47, after paragraph 10 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191162}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191162},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191162, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}