Vote · Roll call

Amendment 45, after paragraph 1

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote: Amendment 45, after paragraph 1
Decision: No. 8 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 99 for · 547 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 13:38

More facts (6)

Position: vote 3 of 88 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 1 – Am 45
Text: Report A-10-2026-0044
Dossier: 2025/2246(BUI)
Vote id: 191152

Position: vote 3 of 88 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 1 – Am 45
Text: Report A-10-2026-0044
Dossier: 2025/2246(BUI)
Vote id: 191152

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 42	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 3 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.97
Greens	For 44	Against 0	Abst. 2	No vote 7 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.93
S&D	For 2	Against 121	Abst. 0	No vote 12 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 0	Against 70	Abst. 1	No vote 6 of 77	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 0	Against 167	Abst. 0	No vote 18 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ECR	For 1	Against 74	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
Patriots	For 0	Against 77	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 1	Against 24	Abst. 2	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.83
No group	For 9	Against 14	Abst. 5	No vote 2 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–0–1	0–3–0
Germany	3–0–0	14–0–0	0–13–0	0–9–0	0–29–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	7–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	2–0–1	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	3–0–0	1–11–0	0–13–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–1–2
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–0–1	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	1–17–0	0–1–0	0–8–0	0–19–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–0–1	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–0–1	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	0–19–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	0–10–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	1–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–1	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	Against	Abst.
Austria	1	0
Belgium	5	0
Bulgaria	3	0
Germany	9	0
Denmark	4	0
Estonia	2	0
Spain	1	0
Finland	3	0
France	13	0
Ireland	6	0
Italy	1	0
Lithuania	2	0
Luxembourg	1	0
Netherlands	5	0
Poland	1	0
Portugal	2	0
Romania	3	0
Sweden	2	0
Slovenia	1	1
Slovakia	5	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthias ECKE group that day: S&D · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Ondřej KOLÁŘ group that day: EPP · Czechia
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 14 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.94 608 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	Amendment	95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 651 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 535 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Mar 2026	Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029	Amendment	81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.93 525 voters
18 Dec 2024	Amendment 1 to recital A Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office	Amendment	106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.92 588 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.92 551 voters
29 Apr 2026	Proposal to reject the text Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products	Rejection	99 for, 539 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 15 %		r · shared0.92 625 voters
12 Mar 2026	Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029	Amendment	81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.92 523 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.92 541 voters
18 Dec 2024	Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point d Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office	Amendment	101 for, 533 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.91 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Resolution · report by Nils Ušakovs 28 Apr 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 58 to paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 55 to paragraph 7 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 10 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 10 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III — Amendment 57 to paragraph 16 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191152
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 45, after paragraph 1 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191152, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191152 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191152,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 45, after paragraph 1 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191152}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191152},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191152, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}